I think that's a great question Tapani! It gives us insight into what the Board thinks about the Board - and may help us with our decision.

Ed

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7 Mar 2017, at 18:26, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Not seeing too many questions, how about something different:
> 
> NCPH is in the process of selecting its Board member.
> What advice would you give us in what to look for in a candidate?
> 
> I'd be kind of curious to see what they'd say to that...
> 
> Tapani
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>> 
>> Sounds like we'll only have one question for the board...
>> 
>> Kathy, can you have publishable phrasing for it today?
>> 
>> Anybody else, if you have other questions to suggest, please
>> let us know TODAY. Thanks.
>> 
>> Tapani
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 02 10:55, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>>> 
>>> Tapani,
>>> 
>>> These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right?   I think we
>>> should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our
>>> efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants,
>>> compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and
>>> compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community
>>> (not a subset).
>>> 
>>> This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain
>>> provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about
>>> compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the
>>> board? (Please respond privately.)
>>> 
>>> Best, Kathy
>>> 
>>>> On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking
>>>> Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you.
>>>> 
>>>> So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather
>>>> impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by
>>>> the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated.
>>>> 
>>>> Tapani
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> NCUC members,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the
>>>>> stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG):
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in
>>>>> CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2?  What could the Board or ICANN
>>>>> organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this
>>>>> work?
>>>>> 2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to
>>>>> ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about
>>>>> these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our
>>>>> input to that thread.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our
>>>>> questions!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Farzaneh