NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Poomjit Sirawongprasert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:30:29 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (636 bytes) , text/html (1013 bytes)
Hi,

I think this article is very interesting about cybersquatting, redirection
porn ads page and registrar's responsibility.
But I am wondering if it is fair for normal internet users or businesses?

http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/january-/domain-registrar-not-liable-for-cybersquatting-us-court-rules/

The court ruled that Go Daddy had not used the domains and was therefore
not liable for cybersquatting under the terms of ACPA.

Poomjit Sirawongprasert (Moui)
ภูมิจิต ศิระวงศ์ประเสริฐ (หมวย)
twitter: @Moui <http://twitter.com/moui>
facebook: PoomjitS <http://facebook.com/PoomjitS>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2