NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Magaly Pazello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Magaly Pazello <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:40:23 -0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
Thank you Rafik to put all information together, well done!

It also will help us with the NCSG strategy and next steps regard not only
with this particular issue but also to think about the dynamics within NCPH
as Sam and Avri have called our attention to.

Magaly

On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
> well you can find below the request sent to Kristina Rosette to put Sam
as compromise. as member of NCSG PC you are aware about that,
> I also added the archive regarding the call between NCSG and CSG
leadership,that you attended,  discussing the compromise proposal  which
agreed that Sam will send his statement and have the call with cSG:
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/2014-May/001526.html
> http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/2014-May/001542.html
> Rafik
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2014-04-30 22:57 GMT+09:00
> Subject: Re: NCPH Election - round three results
> To: "Rosette, Kristina" <>
>
>
> Hi Kristina,
>
>
> IGF needs improvement and that was the call for many years, including the
CSTD WG on IGF improvements and we got momentum with netmundial.
> I will wait for your confirmation for the call then. Yes, that is it, a
compromise candidate for both sides of the house, I attached his CV.
> and if needed he should present himself to CSG .
> Best Regards,
> Rafik
> 2014-04-30 5:41 GMT+09:00 Rosette, Kristina <>:
>>
>> Hi Rafik,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m definitely interested to see how IGF changes and I suspect I know
the points in the document that you’re referring to.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ll reach out to the CSG Excomm about having a call on 7 May.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ll take the proposal to put forward Sam Lanfranco as the only
candidate (that’s what you meant, correct?) back to the CSG Excom.  We
haven’t previously discussed the possibility of only one candidate so I’m
not in a position to share any input, unfortunately.  I don’t know Sam (and
actually don’t believe I know of him).  Do you have his CV that you could
share?
>>
>>
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Kristina
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:36 PM
>>
>> To: Rosette, Kristina
>> Subject: Re: NCPH Election - round three results
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Kristina,
>>
>>
>>
>> thank you. Netmundial was a good experience to see how
multistakeholderism can work effectively to produce outcome and how things
cab improved for IGF process. not necessarily agreeing on several points in
the document which are contentious for civil society in general.
>>
>>
>>
>> we can the call in 7th May (UTC) to have enough time to prepare for it
and that wont interfere with INTA conference.
>>
>>
>>
>> for NCSG, we had discussion on how to go forward for this phase ( for
future election, we need to discuss about the process later) :  we would
like to start the process and propose a compromise candidate for CSG and
NCSG,to avoid this deadlock situation. this candidate would be Sam
 Lanfranco.
>>
>>
>>
>> any thought? can CSG share what other options you may suggest?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-29 21:38 GMT+09:00 Rosette, Kristina
>
>
>>
>> Hi Rafik,
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope you had a safe trip.
>>
>>
>>
>> What did you think about NetMundial - generally and the outcome?  I’d be
very interested in your views.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you want to have the call this week or next week?   If next week,
we’ll likely have to have it early in the week as we’re going to lose
almost the entire IPC as folks start traveling to Hong Kong for the
International Trademark Association Annual Meeting, which begins on the
10th and runs through the 15th.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, CSG Excomm had a short call to see if we could identify any
options for moving forward that were on - or off - the table for further
consideration.  The only one we were able to eliminate is changing the
voting threshold of votes required to win the election.  We can’t reduce it
to 7 (from 8) because the bylaws require a vote of 60%, which is 7.8
persons.
>>
>>
>>
>> Has NCSG been able to identify any options that are on or off the table?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Kristina
>>
>> Kristina Rosette
>> Covington & Burling LLP
>> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
>> Washington, DC  20004-2401
>> voice:  202-662-5173
>> direct fax:  202-778-5173
>> main fax:  202-662-6291
>> e-mail:
>> www.cov.com/krosette
>>
>> This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has
been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your
system.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Sent from my Mobile


ATOM RSS1 RSS2