+1
Roy
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion
Hi
On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Hi
The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June. At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
What do people think about the following?
Look fine to me.
Thanks,
Bill
I will ask the NCSG Policy Committee to decide by 6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
Please comment.
Any objections?
Any edits?
-----
NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
- ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
- Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
-----
I can't take complete silence as consent. silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
so please say something
avri
