Hi Klaus,
well you can find below the request sent to Kristina Rosette to put Sam as
compromise. as member of NCSG PC you are aware about that,
I also added the archive regarding the call between NCSG and CSG
leadership,that you attended, discussing the compromise proposal which
agreed that Sam will send his statement and have the call with cSG:
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/2014-May/001526.html
http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/2014-May/001542.html
Rafik
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 2014-04-30 22:57 GMT+09:00
Subject: Re: NCPH Election - round three results
To: "Rosette, Kristina" <>
Hi Kristina,
IGF needs improvement and that was the call for many years, including the
CSTD WG on IGF improvements and we got momentum with netmundial.
I will wait for your confirmation for the call then. *Yes, that is it, a
compromise candidate for both sides of the house, I attached his CV. *
*and if needed he should present himself to CSG .*
Best Regards,
Rafik
2014-04-30 5:41 GMT+09:00 Rosette, Kristina <>:
Hi Rafik,
>
>
>
> I’m definitely interested to see how IGF changes and I suspect I know the
> points in the document that you’re referring to.
>
>
>
> I’ll reach out to the CSG Excomm about having a call on 7 May.
>
>
>
> I’ll take the proposal to put forward Sam Lanfranco as the only candidate
> (that’s what you meant, correct?) back to the CSG Excom. We haven’t
> previously discussed the possibility of only one candidate so I’m not in a
> position to share any input, unfortunately. I don’t know Sam (and actually
> don’t believe I know of him). Do you have his CV that you could share?
>
>
>
> Many thanks!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Kristina
>
>
>
> *From:* Rafik Dammak [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:36 PM
>
> *To:* Rosette, Kristina
> *Subject:* Re: NCPH Election - round three results
>
>
>
> Hi Kristina,
>
>
>
> thank you. Netmundial was a good experience to see how multistakeholderism
> can work effectively to produce outcome and how things cab improved for IGF
> process. not necessarily agreeing on several points in the document which
> are contentious for civil society in general.
>
>
>
> we can the call in 7th May (UTC) to have enough time to prepare for it and
> that wont interfere with INTA conference.
>
>
>
> for NCSG, we had discussion on how to go forward for this phase ( for
> future election, we need to discuss about the process later) : we would
> like to start the process and propose a compromise candidate for CSG and
> NCSG,to avoid this deadlock situation. *this candidate would be Sam
> Lanfranco.*
>
>
>
> any thought? can CSG share what other options you may suggest?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-04-29 21:38 GMT+09:00 Rosette, Kristina
>
> Hi Rafik,
>
>
>
> I hope you had a safe trip.
>
>
>
> What did you think about NetMundial - generally and the outcome? I’d be
> very interested in your views.
>
>
>
> Do you want to have the call this week or next week? If next week, we’ll
> likely have to have it early in the week as we’re going to lose almost the
> entire IPC as folks start traveling to Hong Kong for the International
> Trademark Association Annual Meeting, which begins on the 10th and runs
> through the 15th.
>
>
>
> Also, CSG Excomm had a short call to see if we could identify any options
> for moving forward that were on - or off - the table for further
> consideration. The only one we were able to eliminate is changing the
> voting threshold of votes required to win the election. We can’t reduce it
> to 7 (from 8) because the bylaws require a vote of 60%, which is 7.8
> persons.
>
>
>
> Has NCSG been able to identify any options that are on or off the table?
>
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Kristina
>
> Kristina Rosette
> Covington & Burling LLP
> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
> Washington, DC 20004-2401
> voice: 202-662-5173
> direct fax: 202-778-5173
> main fax: 202-662-6291
> e-mail:
> www.cov.com/krosette
>
> *This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is
> confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has
> been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your
> system. Thank you for your cooperation.*
>
>
>
>
>
|
