Hello,

Indeed a question about globalisation of IANA functions would be
interesting. During the call that we had with Fadi  about the Montevideo
statement, I remember Christine Rosette  expressing her concerns about this
and asking Fadi if he could provide some clarification, to  which he
answered that this is nothing new and has been on the agenda for discussion
for quite some time. Hearing the views of the board about the particular
aspect could be another interesting input.

best,

mll


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> And personally I think globalization of IANA is the more important long
> range goal.  IANA  is the real throttle point for any of this stuff.  ICANN
> is one of two main customers but not the only one.  And if there ever is an
> advance in the number of naming authorities, one of my fonder pipe dreams,
> IANA would be the place the things come together are are served.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 14 Nov 2013, at 12:38, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:
>
> > I support Carlos but would be more specific with the Montevideo
> statement. Globalization of ICANN and Globalization of IANA are two
> different shoes....
> >
> > wolfgang
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos A. Afonso
> > Sent: Thu 11/14/2013 3:15 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Discussion Topics for NCSG with ICANN Board
> at ICANN #48 in Buenos Aires?
> >
> > Hmmm... this is so obvious but I will suggest anyway: how do they see
> > the Montevideo Statement and the ensuing Brazil meeting?
> >
> > --c.a.
> >
> > On 11/08/2013 11:27 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I'm preparing agenda items for our various discussions at the upcoming
> ICANN Meeting #48 in Buenos Aires.
> >>
> >> So please let me know what agenda items you would like to speak to the
> ICANN Board of Directors about during our 1 hour meeting with them in BA.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Robin
> >>
> >
>
>