NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:38:20 -0500
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: .CAT WHOIS Proposed Changes - call for public comments - Think hard!!
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
On 23 Jan 2012, at 12:26, McTim wrote:

> I'm not a big fan of obfuscation of contact details in WHOIS, and
> can't see that non-commercials are in any way more or less special per
> this requirement than anyone else!


thanks for the explanation.

So do you:

- object to exclusion for natural persons.
- object to exclusion for legal persons whose tasks involve the protection of natural persons who may be hurt by the publication.  The example is the battered women's shelter where the cop's wife is sheltering.
- object to exclusion for political reasons - e,g the registration details of HR in China, of the LGBTQIA (i.e. gay) association in Uganda
- object to exclusion for any legal person
- object to exclusion by anyone at all - including natural persons.

avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2