NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:12:45 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (768 bytes) , text/html (1188 bytes)
Hi Avri,

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> The freedom to send a political letter to national or international
> leaders seems like it has to be within the list of things that are
> acceptable. And I would think NCUC, whose principle value seems to be
> Freedom of Expression would have to support this, even for opinions we
> don't support.
>


Agreed, they can send out whatever letter or testimony they like.

They should however probably read the documents (DAG) carefully before they
draft their testimony.

My main point was that it was a silly political blunder.  If I were on the
Board, I would be pretty annoyed.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


ATOM RSS1 RSS2