NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Nov 2011 01:07:33 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2659 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)




-----Original message-----

From: Timothe Litt <[log in to unmask]>

To: Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Sun, Nov 20, 2011 17:37:39 GMT+00:00

Subject: RE: [NCSG-Discuss] beyond take down



Does anyone on this list know more about the way BIND is being amended to allow the “rewriting” of DNS answers? Jorge? Timothe?





Yes.  Recent versions of BIND (starting I think with 9.8) have a feature called RPZ = Response Policy Zone.  It is rather controversial.



The intent was to make it possible for enterprise customers to block websites (and other protocols relying on DNS) according to some policy - typically known malware and/or non-work sites.  It doesn't work with DNSSEC.  It has some potential for abuse by ISPs.  As ISC tells the story, this was implemented because of (bind) customer demand, not because ISC thinks it's a good idea.



Here are some references:



http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/taking-back-dns-0



http://www.isc.org/files/TakingBackTheDNSrpz2.pdf



http://www.isc.org/community/blog/201103/blocking-dns





I will refrain from editorial comment - except to note that DNS is not a particularly good place to implement a blocking policy.





Timothe Litt

ACM Distinguished Engineer

---------------------------------------------------------

This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views,

if any, on the matters discussed.



________________________________

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller

Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 12:10

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] beyond take down



Does anyone on this list know more about the way BIND is being amended to allow the “rewriting” of DNS answers? Jorge? Timothe?

From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake

Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:22 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] beyond take down

Hi

As discussed on our call the other night, some of the key developments from a global public interest standpoint go beyond GNSO & ICANN policies but we might still consider whether there's grounds for useful NC engagement…

& BTW Monika quotes Wendy in the below...



http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2011/11/20/filtering-and-blocking-closer-to-the-core-of-the-internet/print/



Filtering and Blocking Closer To The Core Of The Internet?

By Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch on 20/11/2011 @ 1:00 pm



With protests against draft US legislation like the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act ongoing and the European Parliament voting o


ATOM RSS1 RSS2