+1 Lots of pdp work going on. Need help. Useful to know about this,
distracting from main mission to spend time on formal endorsement in my
view.
Stephanie Perrin
On 2016-04-21 18:14, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> Grace
> As far as I know we have not endorsed anything as NCUC - but if we
> have, I was against it at the time. ��
> My concern is that this seemingly innocuous issue sets a precedent and
> before you know it we get 20 requests per year to endorse campaigns
> and causes that are not related to our actual scope of policy making
> authority. Some of those issues might divide us, leading to long
> debates that detract from our ability to do the things we are supposed
> to do.
>
> I see potential for a huge time waste. It's not like we have too
> little to do
>
> So: publicity among and endorsements by NCUC members, Yes. Formal
> endorsement by NCUC, No.
>
> Milton L Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 13:57, Grace Githaiga <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>> Deserves support. Highly recommended. Has NCUC not previously
>> supported non domain issues that are internet related?
>>
>> Rgds
>> Grace
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:48:21 -0400
>> From: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>> To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Yes , +1 and Definitely!
>>
>> This is a good initiative worthy of our support!
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Karel
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > @Milton +1
>> >
>> >
>> > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> > +506 8837 7176
>> > Skype: carlos.raulg
>> > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> > On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>> >
>> >> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing
>> these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals,
>> and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but
>> #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and
>> I think we had better stick to our basic mission.
>> >>
>> >> --MM
>> >>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of
>> >>> James Gannon
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
>> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
>> >>>
>> >>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an
>> infrastructure related
>> >>> campaign.
>> >>>
>> >>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is
>> that this may be
>> >>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
>> >>> endorse?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl
>> Gutiérrez G."
>> >>> <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> on behalf of
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity?
>> Could also be
>> >>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
>> >>>>
>> >
>>
>>
|