I am not sure who you are responding to here Sam...Bill, me, Jeanette, 
Avri, Remmy....have all commented on this.  We have numerous lists to 
discuss the broader issues of IGF...I think we do need to put something 
on the other lists (I had said in an earlier post not to forward my long 
note on strategy as I was writing it for internal NCSG consumption. (by 
the way, I used the word Netmundial when I meant IGF, sorry about that.  
Tired)
The facts and the gathering of stakeholder views should go on the other 
lists.  There is already a discussion going on and I responded to a few 
posts re the sign on.
Personally, I dont think we need to rush to start drafting another 
text.  Let the other players come back to us with a proposal, then we 
send out to all our civil society folks for a concensus decision.  I 
will do another update to the lists in a day or so once we see if any of 
the commercial or govt actors come back to us. There were 4 mentions of 
the proposal in the closing ceremonies, which we are quite pleased 
about, and we also need to report on that to stakeholders.
Further to that, there is already a pad which we set up to draft the 
first one.  We can drop any new draft we get from the commercial or govt 
folks into that pad, just to avoid proliferation of information vehicles.
Does that sound sensible?
Cheers Stephanie
PS in the meantime, we are still getting signatures.
On 2014-09-06, 11:07, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> There is an issue here. The IGF is larger than and apart from NCSG. 
> More than just NCSG folk need to be involved in refining the proposal 
> to give it, at least, the bare bones of how it would operate. That 
> includes how it would link to regional IGFs, as well as funding, 
> accountability, monitoring and evaluation....to keep it on a good 
> track. The new "neutral website" for this effort at 
> www.igfcontinuation.org is only designed to accept sign-ons of 
> organizations, countries, and individuals.
>
>  What sort of electronic venue (wiki?) is being considered so that the 
> rest of the world's stakeholders, beyond NCSG, can participate in the 
> framing dialogue that refines the recommendation?
>
> Sam L.