NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2015 16:45:33 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1122 bytes) , text/html (1802 bytes)
Ready to join the AoC review on competition Ed!

Carlos Raúl
On Aug 2, 2015 4:35 PM, "Edward Morris" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> On Friday the United States Court of Appeals, 9th circuit, released an
> opinion affirming a lower court decision in ICANN's favour in an antitrust
> suit brought by name.space Inc. The opinion is online here:
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/namespace-ninth-circuit-affirming-dismissal-31jul15-en.pdf
>
> At the Paris CCWG meeting Samantha Eisner of ICANN legal expressed concern
> about potential antitrust liabilities the newly independent ICANN will be
> facing. The CCWG counsel brushed off those concerns. I'm not sure that was
> wise.
>
> The name.space complaint failed on a number of grounds. Frankly, they had
> a weak case and, IMHO, framed the markers involved in a way that did not
> help them. That said, please note how often the Court referred to the
> Department of Commerce contract  in affirming ICANN's position. It will be
> very interesting to see what the court makes of an independent ICANN and
> it's monopoly in future antitrust actions.
>
> Best,
>
> Ed Morris
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2