Hi all,

Attached is the working draft of the cross community reconsideration request regarding the staff's decision to impose a staff developed accountability plan that did not take community concerns adequately into account in its formulation and did not allow for a public comment period on the staff's plan before its adoption.  So the several stakeholder groups and constituencies filing it are asking the board to look at that decision and explain it and also hopefully we can get some amendments to the process going forward.  Holding staff to a higher standard for its actions is something the community should have done long ago and the RR process is designed to improve the overall decision making process in this way.

In addition to asking the board to look at the decision with the RR, we should constructively participate in the process which is already underway and begin to prepare our inputs and strategies so we can be effective in our engagement moving forward.  Thank you!

Best,
Robin

Begin forwarded message:
> 
> 
> 




--Apple-Mail=_017D3487-861C-4E8B-B7A7-14404C0E8C22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJT/+9gAAoJEHyDX9QJnOXd4UgIAJyX4yxOthrjJDXaiOr4jer1
zoaETplSCU8j9BcDtNi7qOpuVovLPYEYYH/B82laPLrosGoF/TOwUeoIgfveE3r0
UE9FnMrNbZ4ORvobo751Yx0ehb6E3knXq9i5VoJDvVLPcJ/ofgiPAFjeENzZZpmo
9BGBC5OB8Rij2UsgprzZgn+tP1+VIa40DwqMCdjSw9pdNY5sO0CKoVf/JITLW3ez
weegn5kw0ERwd08U5B3p2mUoZhv6GNRW350phBv65ZLo5ozHpgCvKKNaRGNSwDLr
02XgTqEHghrXPjn8RfJdhSeMHHdnMr7DTISP6hi9t+cS6wZYQQDeFWbWs+NS+rI=
=TAlt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_017D3487-861C-4E8B-B7A7-14404C0E8C22--