NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: motion on Chatham
From:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nuno Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:35:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
The simple idea that someone has something to hide gives me the creeps....

BR,
Nuno

2010/1/28 David Cake <[log in to unmask]>:
> At 5:09 PM -0800 27/1/10, Robin Gross wrote:
>>
>> I'm not so keen on the amendment re: Chatham House rule.   I don't like
>> the idea that the review teams can decide its a secret and its a secret.
>>  Its too easy and there is no limitation on what they can decide is an
>> exceptional circumstance.
>
>        The Chatham house rule means that nothing that is said is secret,
> only who said it. If, in some peoples discomfort with the Chatham house
> rule, we end up giving review teams the option to use more restrictive
> rules, that would be a poor outcome.
>        Cheers
>                David
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2