NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 18:57:02 -0400
Reply-To:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Nicolas Adam <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Thank you both.

I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was 
glad to be able to read some of them in advance.

Nicolas

On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> KK:
> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
>
> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view. I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho.
>
> --MM
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
>> Importance: High
>>
>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and procedural
>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit
>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my
>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic.
>>
>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also
>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) for
>> those who do use open source software.
>>
>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I,
>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July
>> 14, 2011.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> KK
>>
>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC-
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
>>
>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It
>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others
>> can finish it.
>>
>> Milton L. Mueller
>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet
>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2