NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:23:13 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> 3/5/2007 11:10 AM >>>
>these three non-commercials are not the only ones that
>had a problem with the OPOC proposal.  Patrick Vande

Danny, this is disingenuous. WHOIS is controversial. There is not now
and never will be agreement on all details by all parties. If that is
your standard for when the TF is finished it will never be finished. And
of course,  as you know well, that outcome plays perfectly into the
hands of people (such as you?) who want to retain the status quo, which
allows them to plunder and data mine personal contact information in a
completely unresitrcted manner. 

This is a clear demonstratoin of how the notion of "consensus" is
completely inappropriate in any major policy issue, where there are
difficult and controversial conflicts of interest among the parties. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2