Dear Tatiana, all,
Volunteering offlist to me was indeed just fine. I'd intended to wait
until the deadline I gave was over (Wednesday) and then send the list
of candidates to the EC. Now that the cat is out of the bag anyway,
however, I'll note who's volunteered so far, in order to make sure I
haven't missed anyone and to let others who may be consireding it a
chance to jump in:
Avri Doria
Martin Silva Valent
Carlos Gutierrez
Tatiana Tropina
If you have volunteered but are not on that list I've missed you:
please let me know ASAP. And if you aren't, there's still time.
Please try to make it by noon UTC Wednesday.
Also, as others have noted this is not an election but an appointment
by the EC, and I did not intend to ask for expressions of support on
the list. Nonetheless I don't see the discussion on the list as
harmful either -- it may even provide useful extra information for the
EC to consider when making its decision. We won't be counting mere
expressions of support though, that would obviously be unfair to those
who volunteered offlist.
Tapani
On Feb 19 16:40, Tatiana Tropina ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am the one 4 candidates who applied by sending an email directly to
> Tapani, as his email suggested to let *him* know as soon as possible so I
> thought volunteering off-list is fine. I also wanted to avoid long threads
> of plus 1s, as it usually happens. Sorry for any confusion - I answered to
> Tapani directly that I can volunteer right after he sent the initial email
> to the list, and I couldn't foresee how this would develop.
> Warm regards
> Tatiana Tropina
>
> On 19 February 2017 at 16:35, avri <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not at all your fault. I think some were sent to Tapani directly as his
> > original note suggested. It was probably me who first erred by sending it
> > to the list - though in fairness to me, he had suggested in conversation
> > that this is what I should do.
> >
> > Avri
> >
> > Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Nadira Alaraj <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: 2/19/17 15:14 (GMT+00:00)
> > To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Cc: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Call for volunteers: alternate councillor
> >
> > Thanks Avri, for bringing my attention to the 4 candidates, having >20
> > emails and +1 emails, sure made me skip some emails.
> > I apologize for the candidates, whom I missed their emails.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I very much appreciate the support I have gotten. and hope I will be
> >> chosen for more council service.
> >>
> >> However, I would like to point out that there are currently 4 candidates
> >> as far as I know and the call is still open for several more days.
> >>
> >> As far as process, we sort of do have one, the NCSG EC, once all
> >> candidates are in at the end of the week's call. (I think Tapani gave a
> >> week) decides what to do. They have the full range of freedom given by the
> >> GNSO operating procedures.
> >>
> >> While we could define more detailed processes, I think given the variety
> >> of possible exigent circumstances, it is best to leave this open and up to
> >> the elected NCSG EC.
> >>
> >> Avri
> >>
> >> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> >>
> >> -------- Original message --------
> >> From: Nadira Alaraj <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Date: 2/19/17 14:29 (GMT+00:00)
> >> To: [log in to unmask]
> >> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Call for volunteers: alternate councillor
> >>
> >> Thanks Tapani,
> >> I would like to share my observation about email threads, that gets too
> >> much responses when it comes to leadership positions. Not only in the NCUC,
> >> but in many ICANN working groups. I think it is due to lack of any
> >> procedures for such cases.
> >>
> >> I take this opportunity, to call upon the task-force whom they are
> >> working on NCUC procedures, to consider this case.
> >>
> >> As for my opinion on the alternate councillor and since it is a short
> >> period, it could be divided among Avri and Martin. So one will resume
> >> during the period of ICANN 58 and soon to be switched to another for ICANN
> >> 59.
> >>
> >> I think this will be a compromise solution since there are not written
> >> rules.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >> Nadira ALARAJ
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> >> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> As Amr Elsadr resigned from the council upon joining the staff, the
> >>> NCSG Executive Committee needs to appoint a temporary alternate to
> >>> replace him.
> >>>
> >>> If you are interested in the job, please let me know as soon as
> >>> possible, but no later than Wednesday February 22 (one week from now).
> >>> The appointment is on the agenda of EC meeting on February 24, and we'd
> >>> want to have list of names at least two days in advance so we'll have
> >>> time to review them.
> >>>
> >>> Please explain why you think you'd be good for the task and confirm
> >>> you could commit to the time it takes. Jumping in to the council
> >>> mid-term is not easy, so experience is one key criteria for the EC in
> >>> considering the appointment.
> >>>
> >>> The term extends until ICANN60 in the fall in Abu Dhabi, although the
> >>> appointment can be made for a shorter time if the EC so chooses.
> >>> If this makes a difference for you, for example if you'd only be able
> >>> to do shorter time, or if you would not be interested in a shorter
> >>> appointment, let us know that, too.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Tapani Tarvainen
|
