Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 27 Feb 2016 06:59:06 +0900 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tapani,
yes I think those info are public:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/planning-en
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/financials-en
and following up what you mentioned it is also about participating more
effectively in the annual budget planning .
Best,
Rafik
2016-02-27 2:10 GMT+09:00 Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>:
> Sam,
>
> That question is perhaps too broad as such. ICANN budget and
> expenditures are at least supposedly pretty public already.
>
> The question would be more effective if you could narrow
> it down, point to some specific piece of information you
> could not find or get despite asking - some big opaque
> blob you stumbled in a budget report somewhere, say.
>
> Just asking the board to be more transparent isn't likely
> to get us anywhere. They can just say "look, it's all there".
> With something more concrete to wave at them it would be much better.
>
> Actually I think that's something that would be useful for
> us to do in a continuing basis: try to dig into and track
> ICANN's money flows, looking for odd or hidden things.
> That way we might come up with some really hard questions
> for the Board.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:49:21AM -0500, Sam Lanfranco ([log in to unmask])
> wrote:
>
> > As a complement to the "work flow burden" issue I would like to ask
> > about more transparency with regard to
> > how ICANN funds are allocated to internal and external support of
> AC/SC
> > activities. Who gets what to do what?
> > Sam L.
>
|
|
|