NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:15:14 -0500
Reply-To:
Eric S Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
Eric S Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Internews
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Dear Carlos,

I agree with the sentiments expressed by several other silent partners--I
don't always have the time or expertise to pay attention to the issues well,
but am very glad to have some "trusted folk" out there who are formulating
opinions for us and who can speak for us. I feel well-informed about what
positions are being taken in the NCUC's name and (speaking for this
constituency member) comfortable with them. :-)

Best,
Eric 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Carlos Afonso
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:01 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Statement on new gTLDs
> 
> This is OK (it is the way it works in representative 
> democracies, or should work...), but we do need explicit 
> consent from all of our members to proceed. I recall the 
> chair is just a facilitator/moderator, not a ruler... :)
> 
> However, the drawback is that you run the risk of having always those
> 2-3 people doing all the work and deciding for everyone else 
> (in my case at least, this is very uncomfortable), so I 
> continue to hope we will have more constituents' presence in the list.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2