NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:38:29 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (564 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Hi Paul

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Paul Rosenzweig <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>   At all costs we should resist the urgings of a vocal minority of governments (Brazil, Argentina, China, France at the last meeting) that the GAC get an even stronger, formal role in the process.

I’d think it would be useful to address their rationales point by point in any document.

Which problematic positions are shared across them?  Which are specific to individual governments?  Are there synergies with the WSIS+10 submissions?

Thanks

Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2