NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:15:29 +0300
Reply-To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
I agree - just the consumer agenda from me.

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the relevance to consumer etc
>
> On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during our Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15.
>>
>> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can send them beforehand.
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> a.
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2