NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:01:53 +0300
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:44:11PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> There is also long-established precedent of having the EC review the ballot. 

As I didn't remember that happening last year I tried to refresh my
memory, but I can't any sign of that in NCSG EC list archives.

Rafik,

Maybe you remember better, was that done last year somehow
outside the EC mailing list?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2