NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:11:37 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (306 bytes) , text/html (3208 bytes)

On Sep 26, 2014, at 2:06 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Given that
> the NCSG has not prepared its own comment, and has been working with the
> rest of SOAC & SGs this far on statements, not doing so now is probably
> a political statement we don't want to make.


That’d be my bottom line as well.

Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2