NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:19:37 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1138 bytes) , text/html (6 kB)
	It may be that other UDRPs are filed by national Olympic Committees rather than the IOC itself - the IOC has the treaty of Nairobi, but that only protects the 5 rings logo, and the national Olympic Committees usually have special (and often fairly outrageous IMO) laws to wield. 

Or it may be that IOC are just exaggerating for rhetorical effect. 

Cheers

	David


On 01/06/2012, at 8:04 AM, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

> Hi all I’ve had to step back from being involved in this GNSO Drafting Team – too much else going on. I really appreciate the work that Avri and Mary are still doing,  and wanted to share this news item link:
> http://domainincite.com/olympic-domain-watch-list-shows-hundreds-of-squats-legit-names-too/
> It states:
> “ The IOC, incidentally, has only ever filed 15 UDRP cases, on average fewer than two per year, so claims about spending “significant amounts” on enforcement are questionable.”
> Does anyone know if that is accurate? If so, I thought it might be relevant in some way in the DT considerations.
>  
>  
> Joy Liddicoat
> Project Coordinator
> Internet Rights are Human Rights
> www.apc.org
>  



ATOM RSS1 RSS2