I too am glad that they have hit the stop button on this bad idea. If 
there is a meeting with PIR in Copenhagen I would like to be involved, 
to improve the economist:lawyer ratio (maybe).

Sam

On 2/23/2017 9:42 PM, David Cake wrote:
> I knew Phil and the EFF were both concerned about this issue and made 
> sure they were in contact. I’m glad that we didn’t even get to the 
> point of having to finish drafting and sign on before it seems to have 
> had effect!
>
> The backdown by PIR is very welcome - but as Farzy says, a halt for 
> now by PIR doesn’t mean this process has stopped entirely, and we need 
> to really engage with the multi-stakeholder community and understand 
> our concerns not just with the proposal itself, but the process by 
> which it was developed.
>
> I would welcome having a representative of PIR meet with us at an SG 
> or Constituency meeting in Copenhagen to discuss our concerns.
>
> David
>