NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Baudouin SCHOMBE <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:35:06 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1456 bytes) , text/html (2475 bytes)
is it really necessary to return to this question? It was much discussed during
the creation of consitutiencies.


SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN

Téléphone mobile:+243998983491
email                  : [log in to unmask]
skype                 : b.schombe
blog                    : http://akimambo.unblog.fr
Site Web             : www.ticafrica.net





2011/10/14 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>

> On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:43, Alain Berranger wrote:
>
> > Since NCUC leadership is controlling NCSG (approval of NPOC members and
> its impact on the election process, travel allocation issues, etc...) there
> is not much space for NPOC to debate.
>
>
> I beleive this is a false statement.
>
> The NCSG-EC is composed of both NCUC and NPOC.
> Yes they have yet to learnt to work together, but the NCUC is not
> controlling the NCSG.
>
> Even the previous NCSG-EC had an NPOC member on it.
>
> And I have been trying to get the NPOC members to join the NCSG for over a
> year, but most refused to do so until they got their constituency.
> And further, on the vote, of the NPOC members who had been accepted as
> members, only a few ever bothered to check in, hence like most of the NCUC
> inactive members, cannot vote.  This has NOTHING to do with the NCSG-EC or
> allegations of prejudice by NCUC.
>
> Which made me curious about their commitment to membership.
>
> In my opinion the only reason NPOC is not involved in the debate is because
> the NPOC has not bothered to involve itself in the debate.
>
> avri
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2