I am with McTim on this one.

Nicolas

On 2014-03-23 1:47 PM, McTim wrote:
> It is a perfectly reasonable statement IMO.
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> just to clarify about this statement as NCSG comment on IANA transition:
>> - we had the PC meeting today and discussed about the statement as was
>> requested. we made some changes suggested during the meeting.
>> - this version was circulated  by Milton to the NCSG list with 24 hours for
>> comments.
>> - after that I will send it on behalf of NCSG to the concerned parties.
>> hope that is much more clear.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-23 17:51 GMT+09:00 Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>:
>>> Visible here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sJ0Fo_4LalYbyRuq4B3X5uf7TySIDq9Mrb3UVByoXIg/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>
>