LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:39:03 +0000
Reply-To:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Documents pertaining to the third meeting of the WGEC as of at the time when the meeting concluded.
MIME-Version:	1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:	Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (23 lines)

Hi,

On 02-Mar-14 20:13, Marilia Maciel wrote:
> Hi Avri,
> Thank you very much. It seems that the most substantial proposals, in
> any direction, are in document B (no consensus). Could you clarify what
> the next steps of the WGEC are?

I don't really know.

There is a bit of discussion over whether those in B that have no 
consensus can get another hearing.  Since we got nowhere on them in 5 
days it is unlikely we will get anywhere on them in 3.

The plan is to review the things we have not yet reviewed (Doc C) and 
finalize those we were close on (Doc A).  Doc B is probably a dead end 
for now.

But, there are two months until the next meeting with Brazil in the 
intervening time, so I guess anything is possible.

avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU