NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carlos Raul Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:38:02 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1145 bytes) , text/html (9 kB)
Thune & Rubio certainly deserve a place in the Accountability discussion!

Enviado desde mi iPad

_________________________
email [log in to unmask]
skype carlos.raulg
cel   +506 8335 2487
home  +506 4000 2000

Apartado 1571-1000
San jose COSTA RICA


El 11/08/2014, a las 10:23, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]> escribió:

> Hi Avri,
>  
> Thanks for doing this.
>  
> Would it be possible to insert the word "transparency" in the document somewhere? I'd suggest here: 
> 
> inherent conflict of interest behind staff developing its own
> accountability and transparency mechanisms, so it was surprising to see that input had
>  
>  
> but anywhere is fine. The important thing is to keep the concept alive, and the concept of accountability broad.
>  
> I'll note that the Thune-Rubio letter that so concerned Mr. Chehade: 
>  
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/thune-rubio-to-crocker-31jul14-en.pdf
>  
> calls for a FOIA type mechanism at ICANN. In debating accountability structures I don't want to lose sight of the fact that accountability without transparency is impossible.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Ed
>  
>  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2