I'd also like to be on the list, if it is created.
Joonas, I have made the case for a Proportional Representation (PR) method to be used, and STV (a PR method) would be an improvement over the current approach, I think. Reweighted Range Voting (RRV) is another worthy option.
Neal McBurnett http://neal.mcburnett.org/
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:09:32PM +0300, Joonas Mäkinen wrote:
> I'd like to join the list too if such is created. Has there already been a reasoning for/against Single Transferable Vote (SVT)? It
> gives great voter satisfaction and discourages tactical voting.
>
> maanantai 5. syyskuuta 2016 Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti:
>
> +1
>
> Now is the time to resolve the election issues, while the topic is bright in our minds. Let's not put it on the back burner,
> but instead push through and find the consensus. We've already had several suggestions about how to fix the process, let's
> continue exploring.
>
> One suggestion that was made was to have a No vote for each candidate in multiple-winner races. There was multiple support for
> that, but also a suggestion that that was not sufficient even so. Let's continue the discussion.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 9/5/16 12:32 AM, dorothy g wrote:
>
> Congrats to all! and finally we can get to work on fixing our election regulations so that we can have peaceful and
> transparent elections next time around
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joonas "JoonasD6" Mäkinen
> www.joonasmakinen.com
>
> Vice Chairperson (international affairs), Pirate Youth of Finland, www.piraattinuoret.fi
> Vice Chairperson, Alternative Party, www.altparty.org
>
> Faculty of Medicine +
> Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science
> University of Helsinki
>
> mobile +358 40 700 5190
> Facebook, Twitter, G+, Skype, IRC, Steam: JoonasD6
|
