NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Date:
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:56:58 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi,

As a mental exercise, what are the technical implications and risks of private/restricted TLDs other than the addition of EPP functionality for confirming when a registration is allowed?

avri

EPP:  Extensible Provisioning Protocol  RFC 3730 et al.

On 11 Mar 2013, at 13:38, McTim wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Carlos A. Afonso <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> And this is something that several people in the so-called "technical
>> community" find beyond their understanding
> 
> I think this is incorrect.  If a good case were made that a closed TLD
> restricted competion, I for one would be happy to agree with it.
> 
> Just asserting the fact without evidence doesn't make it so.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2