NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:32:56 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2643 bytes) , text/html (5 kB)
Hi Ayden

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say, not bloody likely….

Anyway, some of the board inevitably will read our questions through the prisms of collective memory, ingrained assumptions, third hand stories, etc etc.  Probably can’t control for this other than to take a second and explain what is intended at the front end...

Bill

> On Oct 19, 2016, at 19:11, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Also — I appreciate that the Board likes to receive a copy of our questions in advance (presumably so that Staff can draft a response or prepare a briefing for them)... But is there any chance we can get a copy of these notes in advance, too, so that we know our question(s) have been interpreted correctly? I remember this being an issue in Marrakech where one of our questions had been read differently than we had intended.
> 
> Ayden  
> 
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>> Local Time: 19 October 2016 6:06 PM
>> UTC Time: 19 October 2016 17:06
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> 
>> 
>> I agree - we know the answer.  SO lets use this more productively and say where we are on the various strands on HR and that we look forward to their continued engagement or something similar.  
>> 
>> To Bills point we need to be constructive and forward looking in our discussions with the Board as well.
>> 
>> Matthew
>> 
>> 
>> On 19/10/2016 18:01, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> That will be a quick one... Answer=no.  Next.:-)
>>> 
>>> But of course we should ask. 
>>> Steph
>>> On 2016-10-19 12:35, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I'd suggest:
>>>> 
>>>> Is the ICANN board making steps to implement a Human Rights Impact
>>>> Assessment of ICANN the organization?
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> 
>>>> Niels
>>>> 
>>>> On 10/19/2016 02:29 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our
>>>>> meeting with them in Hyderabad.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Suggestions?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> --------------
>> Matthew Shears
>> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
>> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
>> + 44 771 2472987
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>> 
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2