 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:59:33 +0000 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you Avri for everything you have done. Words cannot say enough.
-James
On 26/10/2015, 10:41 a.m., "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Avri Doria" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>As these were passed as part of my last meeting as a council member, I
>will do my last council list forward as part of my duties as a member of
>council from NCSG.
>
>It was my honor to serve, and I wish Stefania who is now holding that
>seat, the best. I also give my best regards to the renewed and incumbent
>members. Have a great year.
>
>thanks for the opportunity to serve as an NCSG representative on the
>council,
>
>avri
>
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: [council] GNSO Council Resolutions October 2015
>Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:04:00 +0000
>From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
>To: GNSO Council List ([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>Dear Councillors,
>
>Please find the resolutions passed at the GNSO Council meeting today,
>Wednesday 21 October 2015.
>
>*1. Approval of the Data & Metrics Working Group Recommendations (non-PDP)*
>
>WHEREAS
>
>On 17 October 2012 the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on metrics
>and reporting (see
>http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/uofr-final-31mar13-en.pdf).
>
>On 16 May 2013 the GNSO Council deliberated a recommendation on the
>Uniformity of Reporting from the Registration Abuse Policies Working
>Group (RAPWG) and approved a non-PDP Working Group to consider metrics
>and reporting:
>
>“The GNSO Council further approves the creation of a drafting team to
>develop a charter for a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional
>methods for collecting necessary metrics and reporting from Contracted
>Parties and other external resources to aid the investigation.”
>(http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20130516-1).
>
>On 23 Jan 2014 the GNSO Council approved the charter for a Data and
>Metrics for Policy Making Working Group (DMPM WG) (see
>http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140123-1).
>
>The Data and Metrics for Policy Making WG (DMPM WG) deliberated the
>issues as defined in its charter and published an Initial Report for
>public comment on 29 July 2015 for the required 40 day period (see
>https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en
><mhtml:file://C:%5CUsers%5CGlen%5CDocuments%5CMotions+21+October+2015.mht%21https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en>).
>
>The DMPM WG reviewed the input received (see public comment review tool)
>and updated its report accordingly.
>
>On 9 October 2015 the DMPM WG submitted its Final Report
><http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> to the GNSO
>Council.
>
>RESOLVED,
>
>The GNSO Council adopts all the consensus recommendations in the Final
>Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> and
>instructs ICANN staff to begin implementation of the seven recommendations.
>
>The GNSO Council thanks the DMPM WG for its efforts and recommends that
>the WG be formally closed as a result of the adoption by the GNSO
>Council of the WG’s recommendations.
>
>The WG nevertheless requests that the WG remain available to provide
>input to the GNSO Council and ICANN staff should any questions or issues
>arise in relation to implementation of its recommendations prior to the
>formation of an Implementation Review Team.
>
>The GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to prepare an evaluation report
>for the GNSO Council shortly after the conclusion of implementation of
>this pilot effort.
>
>*2. Process and Participation in CCWG-Accountability*
>
>Whereas
>
>On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross Community
>Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability);
>
>On 3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2ndDraft
>Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 September 2015;
>
>The CCWG-Accountability has analyzed the comments received in the review
>of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference
>implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those comments;
>
>and The CCWG-Accountability is working in a considered and collegial
>manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;
>
>Acknowledging
>
>the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountability by the team
>which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we
>are grateful for his time and consistent effort;
>
>Resolved
>
>The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in
>CCWG-Accountability,
>
>its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal
>of finding solutions with broad agreement for ICANN accountability in
>preparation for IANA transition, and
>
>to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before
>declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes.
>
>Please let me know if you have any questions.
>Thank you.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Glen
>
>
>
>Glen de Saint Géry
>GNSO Secretariat
>*[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>*
>*http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
|
|
