Here just trying to manage your 'CEO responses expectations.'

I attended the CEO Roundtable at Seoul. The first thing was 'setting
of the ground rules' - its an opportunity for the CEO directly
interact and hear the views of 'off-the-street' Internet community
member.

One is free to say pretty much *anything* since nothing was to leave
that room. It's great that David asked for question tips but I doubt
he'll be in a position to post responses on the list :(

kindly,

Alex

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If you go straight with the triple X theme Rod will get out of the bag
> the politically correct answer, I guess we have to be more clever and
> ask if he supports the independent review process and how he thinks
> the board has to act given that as far as I know the review process is
> not binding.
>
> My .02
> Jorge
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Konstantinos has provided a better way of asking the question I was trying to ask with my second question.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> David, I would also add to any questions on the new gTLDs, whether he
>>> believes that the trademark protection issue can now be considered
>>> resolved after the work of the STI. Whether after the last public
>>> comment period and the acceptance of the STI's work, trademark
>>> protection is no longer an issue nor will it be resuscitated in the
>>> future.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-
>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>>>
>>> You could also ask whether he thinks it's a good idea to allow powerful
>>> interest groups keep trying to re-write the policies governing the new
>>> gTLD introduction.
>>>
>>
>