As Carlos wrote" for the specific purpose" -do we have any kind of 
statement from the researchers that they will not disclose the addresses 
to others, etc.?

We talk a lot about WHOIS and privacy protection, so I understand that 
Milton "does not feel comfortable."

But if the purpose is clearly defined and at least some assurance given 
(though I think it would be very difficult to verify the use of the data 
- beyond getting an assurance).

If you feel that there is some kind of undertaking in terms of privacy - 
my address representing a NCUC member can go to them.


Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia

=

Carlos Afonso wrote:
> Milton, for the specific purposes mentioned, I do not see a problem. In
> my view (which I recognize is of a tiny minority within NCUC) the whole
> TLD system needs a complete revamping, and if there is an academic
> institution (hired by ICANN or not) to provide quality analytical
> feedback, we should support it.
>
> frt rgds
>
> --c.a.
>
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>   
>> I've received this. Basically they are asking for our membership list and all relevant contact details for each member organization. I do not feel comfortable releasing this information without informing everyone and letting you know what's up. Comments, please. 
>>  
>>
>>     
>
>