NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:40:21 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (742 bytes) , text/html (1655 bytes)
Hi Evan

On Oct 12, 2012, at 6:59 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Merge the proposed group with the ISP stakeholders and call the newly-rechartered result the "infrastructure constituency" -- which is what I thought it should have been in the first place.

I have to wonder how well the telecenters' interests and positions on gTLDs (TBD) would fit with those of the ISPs, particularly since some of the latter are not insubstantial players with varying degrees of market power.

If the telecenters want to get involved I think they should be given their own space in CSG to develop without getting squashed.  Let some flowers bloom in CSG, just as they advocated for NCSG.

I suggest this topic be at the top of our list for our board meeting.

Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2