NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Norbert Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Norbert Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 May 2012 23:12:50 +0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1139 bytes) , text/html (1975 bytes)
+1  in THEORY the original question sounds well, in PRACTICE it is quite 
different.


Norbert


On 5/17/2012 14:09, David Cake wrote:
> On 17/05/2012, at 1:42 PM, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
>
>> On 05/16/2012 08:43 AM, David Cake wrote:
>>> I've suggested previously that the only reason alternate roots have
>>> failed in the past is that none of them have got significant user
>>> share, and that Pirate bay/The Pirate party is one of the few groups
>>> that could probably provide impetus for a significant uptake.
>>   Why do you think Pirate Bay would gain more traction than
>> the other alternate roots? What makes them different from
>> AlterNIC and the like?
> 	A very small percentage of the population care about DNS, and even know what AlterNIC is.
> 	A much larger percentage of the population care about access to pirated media, and know what Pirate Bay is.
> 	Or to put it another way - does anyone think it likely that AlterNIC, or other alternate roots, would ever have their own political party, that actually gets members elected in several countries?
> 	Cheers
> 		David
> 	

-- 
Norbert Klein

Website: http://www.thinking21.org
eMail: [log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2