NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Jan 2010 14:55:16 -0500
Reply-To:
Joly MacFie <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: brief report on NCSG Policy Discussion Wednesday 6 January
From:
Joly MacFie <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:07 PM, William Drake
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *The contention that GNSO has provided no policy guidance from which the DAG VI/JM shifts would be deviation

Is there anywhere a concise summary of what the current DAG policy is,
and what the shifts are?

If not, what are the relevant para's in the DAG?

joly




-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2