NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:52:50 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1023 bytes) , text/html (3530 bytes)
Carlos:
Thanks for your input. The future of the AoC is almost certainly going to be out of scope for this group; it would be covered more by the accountability process. There is no direct relationship between the AoC and the IANA functions as far as I can tell.

In my case there is one single thing I want to know if its covered or not by the "scope". And that single issue is the life of the AoC after the transition. There are different scenarios: Is it going to remain in its basic form with some changes (i.e. more signatories), or is it going to disappear and replaced by more formal instruments (absorbing into the By Laws for example?). And I hope the answer is clear. Because if the scope does not cover this issues I want to know where is it going to happen then. In the Accountability process? are they going to merge both at some point? This double edged scopes of transition on the one side and accountability on the other does not make full sense to me.




Cheers and have a safe trip to London

Carlos Raul


ATOM RSS1 RSS2