NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NPOC Q&A Document
From:
Kimberley Heitman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 03:39:04 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (905 bytes) , text/html (5 kB) 
Looking at the IP-owner agenda of the NPOC, it's no surprise that there is
going to be considerable resistance to commercial interests being asserted
within the NCSG. Obviously the proper place for its shadowy members is
within the Intellectual Property Constituency with the other IP lawyers.

-----------------------
Kimberley James Heitman
www.kheitman.com
----------------------- 

  _____  

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Amber Sterling
Sent: Monday, 8 November 2010 11:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: NPOC Q&A Document

 

Hi All,

 

Thank you for your questions and patience.  Attached is the Q&A document we
created to address your questions about the NPOC.  We will send updated
information regarding our membership towards the end of November.

 

Kind regards,

Amber

 

Amber Sterling

Senior Intellectual Property Specialist

Association of American Medical Colleges

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2