NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:32:01 -0300
Reply-To:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Carlos Afonso <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
... and since I am at it, did anyone consider the guarantees to be set 
in place so that the USA government does not decide to reverse the 
process at a certain point in time, after the conclusion of the 
transition, and take it over again?

This could happen if the post-transition dynamics leads to new 
arrangements which the US government does not like, or if a change in 
the US government might lead to a full review of the process.

How secure this will be after its conclusion?

fraternal regards

--c.a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2