I would just note that while WIPO has an arbitration centre –it is primarily responsible for certain international IP Treaties and their amendment.
It is a branch of the UN and responsible for IP Treaties and other services related thereto –including international trade mark registrations.
See http://www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/what_is_wipo.html
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations. It is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible international intellectual property<http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/> (IP) system, which rewards creativity, stimulates innovation and contributes to economic development while safeguarding the public interest.
WIPO was established by the WIPO Convention<http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/convention/> in 1967 with a mandate from its Member States<http://www.wipo.int/members/en/> to promote the protection of IP throughout the world through cooperation among states and in collaboration with other international organizations. Its headquarters are in Geneva, Switzerland
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC
81 Oxford Street,
London W1D 2EU.
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Authorized and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: 13 October 2011 15:22
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCSG input on request for special privileges for Red Cross & International Olympic Committee regarding Internet domains
Hi Alain
I am little bit confused by a statement that you made,
ICANN cannot substitute for INTA, WIPO, etc... it must only respect INTA, WIPO, etc... rules and regulations.
I may understand for WIPO (which is btw an arbitration center) and I have some reserves about that , but I am puzzled that you imply that ICANN must respect INTA "rules and regulations",for remind INTA is an association for trademark holders and professionals, which means an interest group.
Best Regards,
Rafik
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>
> TLD .olympic, .red-cross, .ngo, .iso, .intl, .iata (variant
> .aita), .icao (variant .oaci) and .code should be protected.
>
Protected from what?
Since when does someone own .ngo? If so, who?
Why .intl? Who has rights in that? Why?
JFC, I believe that the whole attitude here is wrong. I strongly resist the idea that we can create fiat global property rights in alphanumeric character strings just because someone on an email list thinks it's a good idea to "protect" whatever happens to be his or her pet organization. Lets try to be more systematic and think about long term consequences, clear rules, etc.
--MM
--
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI, http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca<http://www.schulich.yorku.ca>
Trustee, GKP Foundation, www.globalknowledgepartnership.org<http://www.globalknowledgepartnership.org>
Vice Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824<tel:%2B1%20514%20484%207824>; M:+1 514 704 7824<tel:%2B1%20514%20704%207824>
Skype: alain.berranger
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6540 (20111013) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
|
