NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:07:43 +0300
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: *Important* NCSG 2016 Annual Elections - Voting rules
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:59:15PM -0400, Sam Lanfranco ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> I agree that this is how it is now supposed to work, but what happens if
> someone votes for all candidates, and NOTA?

In that case the vote is invalid.

Technically it would apparently be possible to notify the voter of
this situation and ask him or her to vote again. We discussed this but
didn't decide if that should be done, as time ran out.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2