My conciliation proposal does not call for a freeze/moratorium, so if 
the phrase proposed is not included, it will not be for this reason.

If the phrase I suggested (or a similar one) is to be associated with 
the proponent, instead of being included in the NCUC statement, then I 
prefer to submit my proposal through other channels, including the idea 
of a temporary freeze, of course.

[]s fraternos

--c.a.

Milton Mueller wrote:

>I would say that strong opposition to the idea of a moratorium has been expressed, and no support expressed aside from Carlos. So my preference would be to identify that idea with its proponent, Carlos, if it is included at all.
>
>  
>
>>>>Mawaki Chango <[log in to unmask]> 1/31/2006 3:30:26 PM >>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>I haven't got any new reaction on Carlos' last proposal so far - is
>there any support? Thanks Carlos! Sorry I couldn't get earlier to my
>
>.
>
>  
>