NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:05:08 -0500
Reply-To:
Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Carl Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Right Dan,

And that is why our open discussions are so important.  We must educate 
each other with information and debate to arrive at the proper 
conciseness to represent the best choices for the largest benefit to the 
most people.

Lou

On 2/1/2013 3:10 PM, Dan Krimm wrote:
> I think the overall point is that expertise and experience are not the
> same thing, and that while a baseline level of expertise is necessary,
> experience adds much that expertise does not guarantee in itself.
>
> Expertise is a narrow measure of value in a deliberative process.  As long
> as there is a sort of "critical mass" of expertise in the group,
> additional variety of experience adds more to collective deliberations
> than additional duplication of expertise.
>
> Dan
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2