NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:29:27 +0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1131 bytes) , text/html (2015 bytes)
I support their submission as a consolidated NCSG comment pending
ratification (or withdrawal) by the policy council.

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Thanks Avri.
>
> Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments,
> especially for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct
> segments)?  Should we each submit what we've written individually, and
> follow up with NCSG endorsement if the policy council approves? (as Avri
> suggested in response to another thread)
>
> --Wendy
>
>
> On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>>
>> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>>
>> noticed a lot of things were ending today.  tough there have been a few
>> extensions in general.
>>
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask]
> Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2