NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Fwd: [council] Summary of IPC Comments on "The Protection of Geographic Names in the New gTLDs Process"
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:55:03 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (383 bytes) multipart/mixed (383 bytes) , text/html (907 bytes) , Summary of IPC Comments on Geo Names Proposal 14 Oct 2014.pdf (119 kB) , text/html (119 kB) , text/plain (119 kB) 
	I think many of us will be interested in the IPC comments on this issue. While NCSG members have differing opinions on the policy priority that should be given to trademarks, it is worth noting that much of the IPCs reasoning holds for whether government interest in geographic domain names should trump free expression and other rights. 
	Regards

		David

Begin forwarded message:






--Apple-Mail=_B2CC0FD6-7DC7-4A07-A519-426734C542E8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPrT3AAoJEPVzXDE37qYXEaoH/1Y57qTvzg5RejvTc3SO7aS2
oUyCCZcmfD+qhXv4oaIa5jOuEor2GCspu/NKvnyvCQatEeLseS0yQlC6iSetSW4X
bqBHjoOVWNx+1lcC3X82Mmphwekevmp9nWC4CtTSJr+tBuc4+jAn6ghVJw3A7L7Z
Ynu7QjJ9+aP2lXNVusJ1p4xbEHCacdapVT74eF67ujODNkPz8OyMKFqlMlMTt69U
2nyll+SEmNwjyi4TuMomLG/NkQHrmsxVfzuM11uTHuJvHER51yZ+gla37VukTuF2
gZsXGiozzL7R3aCTgb9joa0QUErlzspvWG11pmRPIONW//nNcSv4+VrXK8/ADaU=
=cOyu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_B2CC0FD6-7DC7-4A07-A519-426734C542E8--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2