NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:06:48 +0900
Reply-To:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Andrew A. Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
In-reply-to Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]> message dated "Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:45:57 +0900."
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> so now we have to chat about "grandfathering provisions" and need a new cla=
> use in the proposed Charter which is clear on our position that any Constit=
> uency however approved that is a part of NCSG is bound by the Charter rules=
>  of NCSG....

However, if the NPOC is approved as a constituency under the current interim 
NCSG charter and gains certain voting rights under it )as is my reading of 
the interim charter - please correct me if I:m wrong) which it would then 
lose under a new charter, then it gives the NPOC a significant incentive to 
block adoption of the revised charter, and a platform on which to do so. Yet 
another reason why approval of the NPOC under the interim charter should not 
happen.

 

-- 
Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]
Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and
Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics
Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2