NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Drake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:46:58 +0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (833 bytes) , text/html (1862 bytes)
It's not, really.  Surveillance revelations lit the match and changed the political landscape, but the what's been discussed thus far is a broader focus on some mix of principles, USG role in CIR, orphan issues.  Surveillance is being pursued in UNGA.

Bill



On Oct 28, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
> NO. If the primary focus is surveillance, now if they are willing to widen the discussion to universal rights and other issues associated with IG, and governments obsession to gain control, and call for generating an open agenda we are talking about something totally different,
> 
> Regards
> Jorge
>  
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:22 AM, avri <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> http://igcaucus.org/sign-on.html
> 
> Do we want to endorse as ncsg?
> 
> avri
> 
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2