Hi Grace,
I think you have hit on something in your response.
This is not something for the NCSG. However, I'm not opposed to signing on at the constituency level. I've always believed that the SG should be concerned only with ICANN issues but that the Constituencies should have a bit greater latitude to go beyond that.
My suggestion would be to bring this up on the NCUC list and within the NCUC EC. At that level you certainly would have my support.
Best,
Ed
Sent from my iPhone
> On 20 Apr 2016, at 18:58, Grace Githaiga <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Deserves support. Highly recommended. Has NCUC not previously supported non domain issues that are internet related?
>
> Rgds
> Grace
>
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:48:21 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Yes , +1 and Definitely!
>
> This is a good initiative worthy of our support!
>
> regards
>
> Karel
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> > On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > @Milton +1
> >
> >
> > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> > +506 8837 7176
> > Skype: carlos.raulg
> > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> > On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> >
> >> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission.
> >>
> >> --MM
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> >>> James Gannon
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM
> >>> To: [log in to unmask]
> >>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
> >>>
> >>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related
> >>> campaign.
> >>>
> >>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be
> >>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to
> >>> endorse?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."
> >>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be
> >>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.
> >>>>
> >
>
|
